I firmly believe Caesar knew was he was getting into and had he survived, would not have failed his government. He was an active military man who conquered territories and from this he received financial aid. From the book, The Prince, I learned that Machiavelli often chooses a cool, logical perspective that mostly concentrates on his ideal prince remaining in power for as long as he can.
The republic needed this manipulation of the political system in order for Augustus to fix it properly. However, Caesar a great negotiator was able to convince them both that they would work out better as allies rather than enemies. Shortly after he began to govern Gaul or what is now known as France and Belgium where he started to build a large military. Even while his was governing Gaul he was able to maintain his political position is….
His platform was based off all the troubles that Rome currently faced such as the debt crisis and land displacement. He stressed a cancellation of debt which gave him the support of men deep in financial struggles and debt. Afterwards, he and his men would return to take control of Rome. Essays Essays FlashCards. Browse Essays. Sign in. Essay Sample Check Writing Quality. Show More.
By contrast, the era of Octavian to Augustus was grand and more peaceful than the Republic had experienced in a long while. He had the time and wealth to ensure his reforms achieved reality all the while maintaining an image of humility in the eyes of the Roman people. He manipulated Romans and the government to achieve positions of power that were higher than the ones he claimed he wanted, and worked the system so that he garnered the majority of military command.
The emperor saw to it that the Senate was reduced in size to increase effectiveness and reduce their threat to his place as leader. Augustus also made it so Senators must pay attention to discussion, created new jobs in offices which also promoted safety, and reformed the way the government functioned. The Senate and Caesar were on the fast track to failure when they turned their focuses on taking each other out and conspiring amongst themselves instead of cementing true reform.
When it comes down to it, Caesar failed because he was too focused on himself, Augustus succeeded because he turned his focus to the empire despite his manipulation of power. BODY I: Augustus initiated many reforms referring to a social, economic and political matter in order to improve society. One of the first revisions that he made was going over the roll of senators. He felt that was of great importance because senators represent the people.
The Persian Empire fell due to a number of reasons such as bad leadership and poor military tactics; however, the drastic one of all was caused by one man, Alexander the Great. His accomplishments at such a young age sets him apart from every other king. Open Document. Essay Sample Check Writing Quality. The Roman empire will forever hold a legacy as the greatest and longest standing empires in history.
The reasons that a powerful empire such as Rome stood for so long holds a direct link towards two men, Julius Caesar and Augustus. Rome was a fierce and intimidating empire for many, and it ironically has similar attributes to the powerful figures who shaped it. Caesar and Augustus both single handedly changed the empire in the ways they knew best, the empire was not always known as an empire though. Throughout the era of Julius Caesar and the years before him, it was known as the Roman republic.
Caesar achieved a lot during his time, but he could not achieve what his son Augustus did. If Caesar was not assassinated, than it would be very …show more content… Caesar was born into a senatorial family; his uncle was Gaius Marius, a highly respected general in his own right. After the death of Marius, Caesars life was in a crisis as his legacy was threatened by Sulla, an up and coming general.
We know that Caesar had little hope for himself during this time for a few reasons, but the most convincing reason was when Caesar had wept at the statue of Alexander The Great.
He was 31 at the time and when asked why he did this he said he had felt that his life had been wasted up to this point, because when Alexander was 31, he had already conquered the known world Bleicken …show more content… This meant that Augustus was already ahead of Caesar in his ambitions for glory, but it was because of Caesar that Augustus pushed himself like this.
He was simply chasing Caesars standard. The next reason and most likely the biggest difference between the two is their political minds.
Julius Caesar was a brilliant military commander but was arguably not very politically minded, whereas Augustus was. This meant that Augustus could make progress much faster and more efficient then Caesar did. Augustus simply outsmarted everyone around him to gain power, even from his teenage years.
Records make us believe that Caesar was a bit self centred, and focused solely on his military career, rather than building Rome.
Caesar was trying to expand the Roman Republic, and succeeded.
0コメント